It seems it’s becoming an annual event for cycling’s image to be beaten up in the run up to Le Tour. What should be a time of excitement is a time of trepidation. Yesterday, Italian police launched a co-ordinated sting on professional cyclists linked to doctors’ offices in Northern Italy. In the continuing investigation by the prosecutor of Padua, apartments in Florence, Padua, Venice, Genoa, Lucca and Brescia were searched. All the linked riders were clients of a particular doctor who has major ties with the Giro organizers RCS. Over a thousand drugs were seized including the blood product albumin, the appetite suppressant sibutramine and the bovine blood product Actovegin. Among those searched included Riccardo Chiarini (De Rosa), Marco Corti (Footon-Servetto) and Raffaele Ferrara (CarmioOro).
Although the Italian Cycling Federation seems to be doing little to change the drug culture, thankfully the Italian state has taken up the challenge to bring the cheats to justice.
One of the Italian cyclists who forced public opinion and thus civil law to act, was Riccardo Riccò. This week he had his day in a French court to answer the doping charges which helped destroy the reputation of the 2008 Tour de France. Ricco’s expensive legal team was able to negotiate a two month suspended jail sentence and a 3,000 euros fine to be paid to the French Cycling Federation. His positive test for Cera, the third generation EPO could have landed him up to two years in jail. This ‘wrist slap’ in no way stands as a warning to other cyclists tempted by the path of doping. His defence team proved that those who can afford to dope, can get better treatment than those without the finance.
These token fines were again illustrated when Swiss rider Thomas Frei, formerly of BMC Racing Team, was suspended for two years by the Swiss Olympic Council. His positive test for EPO at an out of competition test in March was brought to justice with a paltry 1500 Swiss Francs fine.
The consequences of doping must be shown to be a massive imposition on cyclists. They must be deterred from the temptation to dope by stiffer penalties, both financially and through racing bans.
Although Frei, 25, admitted to having taken a micro dose of EPO the evening prior to the early morning test, he further confessed to having used doping products for some time, and came clean immediately his test returned positive. Yet what was most disturbing was that Swiss Antidoping had offered Frei a deal (according to the Swiss website blick.ch). Frei would receive only a six month ban if he would name those who had assited his doping program. The very fact that he renounced this offer makes it clear that the power of the Omerta still exists, even after a rider is caught.
For any rider to return to racing, after suspension, he or she must come clean about all sources of PED’s and doping knowledge. It is only through this act of contrition will they prove their remorse and assist in transforming cycling to a sport that fans and sponsors can have ultimate confidence in.










































Comments
Eric Jensen 02.07.2010 at 09:16pm
When they are allowed to compete again after two years, they don't want to shoot themselves in the foot by ratting out their potential teammates. Look at Basso: "I didn't inhale" and then he sits quietly and trains, then he gets a fatty contract and now a pile of pink jerseys. Why negatively impact your chances at coming back and making money or at minimum leaving the sport in good favor? He sort of confessed, but not really, but he is photogenic and has seemed to be a reasonably classy guy so he is okay to ride again. There is no real penalty. These guys can figure out how to take whatever it is they take early in their career (aided by the wonderful bio-passport system to a large degree) and if they get banned for 2 years at 24 or 25, then they can still come back during their peak years and compete for a decade. I understand the pressure to do it if everyone else is, but to use the old adage “If Timmy ran off a bridge, would you do it?” Seems to me that every team is likely still ingesting things that might meet the letter of the law (or banned list) but it would still be "doping" in the general sense. I argued against it before, but time for a lifetime ban on the first shot. No choice. Sure, you will have collateral damage because we simply don’t have that specific a grasp of human physiology/biology, but we don’t have a choice. Look at drug testing for employment 20 years ago; you could eat a poppy seed muffin the day before and come up positive as a heroin user. Oops. So, if we are going to truly put a stop to this with lifetime bans and ending the omerta, you have to test and analyze on the back side of the conviction to make sure you exonerate once guilty parties. You just have to think about it full-circle.
Pascal 02.07.2010 at 07:19pm
Dopers are weak. Heros win true
BikePure NY 02.07.2010 at 11:35am
I was aback slapping fan of Frei when he fully admitted using dope when he was caught. But he still does not see the damage it is doing to the sport, if he will not disclose his sources. No repentance - no racing license.
George Haeut 02.07.2010 at 12:03am
Right on!
Write your comment