Ethical Questions on Doping Answered:

By: , , Filed in: Articles

1. If everyone is using drugs in sport, why not just legalise it?

“Remember that athletes don’t take these drugs to level the playing field, they do it to get an advantage. And if everyone else is doing what they’re doing, then instead of taking 10 grams or 10 cc’s or whatever it is, they’ll take 20 or 30 or 40, and a vicious circle simply gets bigger. The end game will be an activity that is increasingly violent, extreme, and meaningless, practiced by a class of chemical and or genetic mutant gladiators.  The use of performance-enhancing drugs is not accidental; it is planned and deliberate with the sole objective of getting an unfair advantage.”
Richard Pound, BCL 
Former President of the World Anti-Doping Agency

2. But if the individual is putting ONLY himself or herself at risk is this not ok?

“Performance enhancers, like steroids and other forms of doping, have a serious negative effect on long-term health. For the users of these enhancers are hurting themselves in the long run without on the average improving their short-term rewards from athletic competition, as long as competitors also use harmful enhancers. This is the main rationale for trying to ban steroids and other forms of doping from athletic competitions.”

Gary Becker, PhD 
Professor in the Departments of Economics, Sociology, and the Graduate School of Business at the University of Chicago.

3. So are educating athletes to the dangers of PED not enough?

“One athlete’s decision to use performance enhancing drugs also exerts a powerful effect on the other athletes in the competition. As reported by Sports Illustrated, half of all recently surveyed Olympic athletes admitted that they would be willing to take a drug — even if it would kill them eventually — as long as it would let them win every event they entered five years in a row. This type of ‘win at any cost’ mentality is pervading sports at all levels of competition and results in athletes feeling coerced to use substances just to remain on par with other athletes.”
USA National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse

4. Does what the pro riders do affect the young fans?

“For many male high school athletes, pro athletes are major influences. They are the role models. They choose the jersey numbers of their favorite professional players. They emulate their training regimens. They emulate their style of play. And they are influenced by their drug use. When a professional athlete admits to using steroids, the message young athletes hear is not always the one that is intended. Young athletes often believe that steroid use by their role models gives them permission to use. That it is simply part of what one must do to become an elite athlete.”
Greg Schwab 
Testimony for the hearing “Steroid Use in Professional Baseball and Anti-Doping Issues in Amateur Sports” before the US Senate Committee

5. But drugs cant make a champion alone, surely talent must have an effect on the result?

Even though skill, strategy, and effort would still play a central role in athletic success, pharmaceutical technology and athletes’ bodily responses to it would also play a significant role. It is not that people are not interested in science fairs; it is just that people expect sport to be a different kind of test, one in which athletes’ own qualities are the major determinants of success-not how good their doping regime is.”
Nicholas J. Dixon, PhD 
Chair and Dykstra Professor of Philosophy at Alma College
”Performance-Enhancing Drugs, Paternalism, Meritocracy, and Harm to Sport,”  Journal of Social Philosophy
0

Comments

Write your comment

Latest news

Must read